1992 Ford Corsair vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1992 Ford Corsair is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1992 Ford Corsair. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Corsair.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Corsair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Corsair. (168 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Corsair | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Corsair | 280 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
