1992 Ford Corsair vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1992 Ford Corsair is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 425 kg more than 1992 Ford Corsair.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Corsair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Corsair | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Corsair | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |
