1992 Ford Corsair vs. 1996 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1996 Nissan Cima is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Cima weights approximately 400 kg more than 1992 Ford Corsair.
Because 1996 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Corsair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Corsair | 1996 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Corsair | Cima |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |