1992 Ford Crown Victoria vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Crown Victoria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Crown Victoria would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Crown Victoria (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Crown Victoria should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 116 kg more than 1992 Ford Crown Victoria.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Crown Victoria. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Crown Victoria (386 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (278 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Crown Victoria will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Crown Victoria | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Crown Victoria | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 3275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1831 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 84 L |
