1992 Ford Escort vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Escort. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Escort would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (237 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1992 Ford Escort. (129 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Escort. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 505 kg more than 1992 Ford Escort. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Escort. (162 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Escort | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Escort | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |