1992 Ford Fairlane vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Fairlane (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 390 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Fairlane (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Fairlane | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | 626 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3948 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |
