1992 Ford Fairlane vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 220 kg more than 1992 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fairlane | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Challenger |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2730 mm |