1992 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1992 Ford Fairlane. (198 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 496 kg more than 1992 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Fairlane. (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Fairlane.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Ford Fairlane 2004 Volvo XC90
Make Ford Volvo
Model Fairlane XC90
Year Released 1992 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 2901 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 198 HP 268 HP
Torque 348 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 2106 kg
Vehicle Length 5230 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2930 mm 2870 mm