1992 Ford Falcon vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (198 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (181 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | 18 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 348 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |