1992 Ford Falcon vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault 25 would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (161 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1988 Renault 25. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 25. (181 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | 25 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |