1992 Ford Falcon vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (161 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Falcon | Elan |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2270 mm |