1992 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Falcon | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |