1992 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1992 Ford Falcon. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Falcon.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 2004 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Falcon | Freelander |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 174 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2570 mm |