1992 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Volvo S60

To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1992 Ford Falcon. (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1992 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S60. (330 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications: