1992 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Xedos 9
To start off, 2004 Xedos 9 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Xedos 9 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1992 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Falcon | 2004 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Xedos |
| Model | Falcon | 9 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 348 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
