1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1992 Ford Fiesta is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fiesta | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Fiesta | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |