1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1992 Ford Fiesta is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fiesta | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Fiesta | Continental |
Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3210 mm |