1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1992 Ford Fiesta is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Fiesta (128 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 35 kg more than 1992 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fiesta | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Fiesta | Murena |
Year Released | 1992 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 116 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |