1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 1996 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1996 Maserati Shamal is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Maserati Shamal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Maserati Shamal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fiesta | 1996 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Fiesta | Shamal |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |