1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Fiesta | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Fiesta | M250 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
