1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Fiesta | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Fiesta | Charger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3048 mm |