1992 Ford Fiesta vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fiesta would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Fiesta | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fiesta | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
