1992 Ford Granada vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1992 Ford Granada is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Granada (101 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Granada weights approximately 1 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Granada (153 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Granada | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Granada | Renown |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2750 mm |
