1992 Ford Granada vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Granada (153 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. 2001 Nissan HyperMini has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Granada has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Granada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan HyperMini will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Granada | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Granada | HyperMini |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 76 L |