1992 Ford Granada vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Granada would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Ford Granada. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Granada.
Because 1992 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 153 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Granada | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Granada | Cruze |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2685 mm |