1992 Ford Laser vs. 1999 Lotus M250
To start off, 1999 Lotus M250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Laser would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1992 Ford Laser. (87 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Laser weights approximately 55 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Because 1999 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Laser. (123 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Laser | 1999 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Laser | M250 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1180 mm |
