1992 Ford Laser vs. 2008 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Laser would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 840 kg more than 1992 Ford Laser.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (505 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Laser. (123 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Laser. 2008 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Laser has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Laser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Laser | 2008 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Laser | XJR |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 505 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2880 mm |