1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar XK (291 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1953 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | XK |
Year Released | 1992 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |