1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (105 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Mustang weights approximately 699 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 600 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |