1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (105 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Mustang weights approximately 315 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1965 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Ford | Wartburg |
Model | Mustang | 311 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 43 L |