1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Cedric |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |