1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 929 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |