1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1988 Holden Barina
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Holden Barina would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1988 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 Holden Barina.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Holden Barina. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1988 Holden Barina | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Barina |
Year Released | 1992 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2250 mm |