1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, both 1992 Ford Mustang and 1992 Volvo 240 were released in the same year (1992). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 240 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |