1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Mazda 626

To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (161 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.

Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Ford Mustang 1995 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 626
Year Released 1992 1995
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2302 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2620 mm