1992 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Honda Civic
To start off, 1999 Honda Civic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda Civic (167 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda Civic. (166 Nm @ 6300 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 1999 Honda Civic | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Mustang | Civic |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |