1992 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Equator |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3260 mm |
