1992 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Toyota GT1
To start off, 2000 Toyota GT1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Toyota GT1. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota GT1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota GT1. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota GT1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Mustang | 2000 Toyota GT1 | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Mustang | GT1 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 93.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2810 mm |
