1992 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Lada Roadster
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster. 2001 Lada Roadster has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lada Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 2001 Lada Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Mustang | Roadster |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2500 mm |