1992 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Mustang | 2002 Honda Acty | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Mustang | Acty |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 660 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2460 mm |
