1992 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Musso is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Mustang | 2004 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | Mustang | Musso |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |