1992 Ford Orion vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Orion would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Orion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 150 kg more than 1992 Ford Orion.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Orion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Orion has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Orion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Orion | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Orion | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
