1992 Ford Probe vs. 1964 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1992 Ford Probe is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Probe weights approximately 107 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Probe | 1964 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Probe | Bellel |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |