1992 Ford Probe vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1992 Ford Probe is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 163 kg more than 1992 Ford Probe.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Probe | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Probe | 240 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 227 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |
