1992 Ford Probe vs. 2006 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2006 Nissan 1400 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Probe would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 1400 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1992 Ford Probe.
Because 2006 Nissan 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Probe | 2006 Nissan 1400 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Probe | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1397 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 227 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |
