1992 Ford Probe vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Probe would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 296 kg more than 1992 Ford Probe.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Probe | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Probe | Z |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11:01:00 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 72 L |