1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Ranger | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
