1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | EH |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 2929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |