1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1967 Mercury Brougham | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ranger | Brougham |
Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |