1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Beta (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1983 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Ranger | Beta |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |